![]() ![]() As to what a work of art is, that is something I believe to be totally up to the observer. ![]() Reproduction allows people to see something they might never have, they allow the artist to gain more exposure, whereas if there had been no reproduction, only a handful of people might have seen it. I do not see reproductions of art to be perversions of the original, and I also do not agree with his outline for a work of art. ![]() His perception of reproductions is that they pervert the original piece, and that by reproduction the beauty and value of the piece is taken away, that the piece is not the same because it does not represent anymore what the artist originally intended. He also talks about reproductions of art. In this article of his, he imposes his opinion of works of art, what constitutes a work of art. John Berger wrote an article entitled Ways of Seeing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |